| Specification | Technics EAH-AZ80E-K | Sony WF-1000XM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Technics | — |
| Model | EAH-AZ80E | — |
| Condition | New | — |
| Type | Wireless | True wireless ANC earbuds |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Noise Cancelling | No | — |
| Driver | — | 6mm (new; magnet/coil +20%) |
| Codecs | — | SBC, AAC, LDAC (up to 990 kb/s; 24-bit/96kHz) |
| Noise cancelling | — | Adaptive ANC + Transparency, Quick Attention, Speak-to-chat |
| Battery | — | 8h ANC / 12h off (quoted); ~36h with case; 20 min = 50% |
| Charging / water | — | Wireless + USB-C; IPX4 splash resistance |
| Extras | — | Sony Headphones app, DSEE Extreme, 360 Reality Audio, multipoint (firmware), V1 chip |
These two premium noise-cancelling earbuds were direct rivals in their day, and both remain strong buys now that their successors have arrived. Sony's WF-1000XM4 set the class benchmark in 2021; Technics's EAH-AZ80 answered in 2023 with a feature-laden alternative that the reviews measured squarely against the Sony. Both offer active noise cancelling, LDAC, memory-foam tips and deep companion apps, but they make different trade-offs. This comparison draws on the complete published tests of both models; Truthful Reviews has not bench-tested either pair itself.
Comfort is the clearest divide. The WF-1000XM4 are bulky: their case shrank 40% from the previous generation, but the earpieces themselves are large, protrude from the ear and, as the tests agree, simply will not suit smaller ears — with only three tip sizes to help. The EAH-AZ80 take the opposite approach: a shaped protuberance fills the ear comfortably, the hold is excellent even without stabilising fins, and Technics supplies no fewer than seven pairs of tips for a near-universal fit. Both use polyurethane foam tips and carry an IPX4 splash rating, but for anyone unsure of their ear size the Technics is the safer bet.
Both are reference-class, and the choice is one of character. The XM4 deliver Sony's mature tuning: warm and rounded, with powerful yet controlled bass, soft slightly rolled-off upper mids, a gently recessed treble lifted by a 10 kHz sparkle, and a soundstage wide and deep for the category — close, the tests found, to the technical level of Sennheiser's Momentum True Wireless 2. The AZ80 are flatteringly energetic and dynamic, with ample, well-defined bass once cancelling is engaged and a lively presentation, though their upper mids carry a slightly tiring edge that can be tamed by lowering the 3.15 kHz equaliser band, and their soundstage is a touch more frontal, lacking the XM4's depth while spreading wide. Both stream over LDAC. In short, the Sony is the warmer, deeper listen; the Technics the more energetic and vivid one.
Here the older Sony keeps a narrow lead. Both attenuate low frequencies superbly — engine drone, ventilation and train rumble all but vanish — but the AZ80's own test placed it a step behind the WF-1000XM4 in the mids and treble, roughly 200 Hz to 2 kHz, and the XM4 remain unusually good at suppressing sudden sounds such as keystrokes. The AZ80 also apply a pressure sensation on activation that some listeners dislike, though they handle wind well. Both rank among the better isolators of their era; on the finer detail, the Sony is marginally ahead.
Neither is a class leader, and the tests are even-handed. The XM4 turned Sony's previously poor hands-free performance into something genuinely usable, aided by bone-conduction pickup, and rank among the good performers of their time. The AZ80's JustMyVoice system makes the voice clearer but imposes heavy sibilance, and switching it off restores a natural tone at the cost of disabling noise reduction entirely — an awkward either/or. On calls the Sony is the slightly more dependable, artefact-free choice.
This is the Technics's territory. The AZ80 run Bluetooth 5.3 with SBC, AAC and LDAC, and — rare at any price — multipoint to three devices simultaneously, available from launch. The XM4 launched on Bluetooth 5.2 with the same codec trio but no multipoint at all; the feature arrived only through a firmware update well over a year later. Latency is high on both, with the AZ80 measured around 530 ms in standard mode and dropping to roughly 160 ms in a dedicated low-latency mode. Both pairs use wear detection, wireless Qi charging and exhaustive companion apps for equalisation and fine control. If you routinely juggle a phone and a laptop, the three-device Technics is the more modern connector.
The Sony edges it on the buds. The WF-1000XM4 were measured at around 9 h 15 with cancelling on the AAC codec and up to 13 h 45 without, dropping to about 5 h 47 on the more demanding LDAC codec, for roughly 36 hours all told with the case. The AZ80 managed a solid 7 h 15 to 9 h depending on whether cancelling is engaged, with a little under three further charges from the case. Both are comfortably all-day performers; the XM4 last a touch longer between charges.
Choose the Sony WF-1000XM4 if sound and silence lead: a warm, deep, reference-class tuning, marginally the better noise cancelling — particularly in the mids and on sudden sounds — dependable call quality and slightly longer battery, accepting bulky buds that smaller ears may reject and multipoint that was a late addition. Choose the Technics EAH-AZ80 if fit and features matter more: a near-universal seven-tip fit with an excellent hold, three-device multipoint from day one, an energetic lively sound and superb build, accepting noise cancelling a step behind the Sony in the mids and a fiddlier calling compromise. Both are accomplished premium earbuds now likely found at a discount beneath their successors; the Sony is the sonic benchmark, the Technics the more comfortable, better-connected all-rounder.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Truthful Reviews may receive a commission when you buy through eligible Amazon UK or Amazon US links, at no extra cost to you. Affiliate partnerships never determine our verdicts or recommendations.